The
referendum is democracy in its purest form; everyone has a vote and the vote of
everyone reading this column will be equal with that of your neighbour, your
member of parliament or your prime minister.
It took
just under a century for this country to move from only a handful of the
population being able to determine who was to represent us in parliament to
full equality for all adults. The 1832 Reform Act started the process that was
completed in 1928 when the voting age for women was reduced from 30 to 21.
Of course
it’s not possible to be holding votes month in month out and as a
representative democracy we entrust most of those decisions to either our local
or national politicians but for major decisions, particularly ones that divide
parties, the referendum is the most appropriate method of gaining the
approval or rejection of the electorate.
Nothing is
more important than determining the future direction of the country which is
why there will be a referendum in Scotland to decide whether or not to leave
the United Kingdom; a policy decided upon by the Coalition with Labour Party
support.
Our
membership of the European Union must surely be as big an issue as Scottish
independence; after all it is an organisation with the aim of European
political union – something I and a large number of voters oppose. It may or
may not be a majority but the only way to test that is via a referendum.
Europe is
a fault line that has run through the British body politic for more than forty
years. If after the 1975 referendum there had been further referendum after
each of the major treaties it is possible that we might still be EU members. I
personally would regret that but the important thing is that as a country it would
be with the consent of the British people. Until we repair that fault line it
is an issue that will continue to divide the nation.
Last
week’s policy statement by Ed Miliband leaves the Labour party policy in a
complete muddle as witness headlines in different newspapers last Thursday
morning. One announcing that it was Labour policy to hold an in/out referendum
and another stating the exact opposite; something that was clearly the result
of the Party trying to spin the same story in two opposite directions – what a
joke.
There is
no way that the British people will be taken in by such blatant doublespeak.
So why
would anyone who favours the democratic process oppose a referendum on such is
major issue; and we must assume that Mr Miliband and his colleagues are
democrats. Could it be that they fear the people may disagree with them? Or
perhaps they consider that we are unable to determine the direction in which
our country goes over the next generation or two?
The Labour
position is that the Scots have the right to determine their own future but not
the British people as a whole.
In the
1975 referendum I campaigned for us to leave the Common Market as it was then
called. Since then it has evolved into the European Union. Its aim of political
union has always been there despite what politicians such as Wilson, Jenkins,
Heath, & Callaghan said at the time. There is a perfectly honourable and
reasoned argument in favour. It’s just one that I don’t happen to share but
whichever side of the argument you are on it is a decision that should be for
all of us. As I said at the start of this article a referendum is for all;
David Cameron will have just one vote, and so will you. It seems reasonable to
me but not to Ed and his Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment